In New York, child support orders can be enforced either by administrative action or by court action. These methods are not exclusive, and in fact, it is common for the local child support enforcement agency to seize income tax refunds, suspend driver’s licenses, and take other action even while a child support action is pending in court. This enforcement operates under the legal framework that balances the rights and needs of both custodial and non-custodial parents to ensure fair support for the child.
If you are a subject child under 21 who is no longer living with a parent, you may, in some circumstances, be able to file your own child support enforcement case.
Administrative Enforcement Of Support Orders
Table of Contents show 1 Administrative Enforcement Of Support Orders 2 Enforcement Of Child Support By The Court 3 How The Family Court Handles Enforcement Cases 3.1 Confirmation Hearings Before A Judge
A custodial parent who obtains a child support order has the absolute right to have payments made through the Support Collection Unit. The Unit, which is part of the Office of Child Support Enforcement, will keep track of payments, and if the non-custodial parent falls behind, the Support Collection Unit can take various actions on its own to collect outstanding child support payments without going to court. The SCU has some very powerful options available, including garnishing wages, seizing assets, and suspending driver’s licenses or other medical licenses. The Office of The Corporation Counsel can assist the SCU on certain cases, and file enforcement cases which can result in jail time. More details are listed below:
- Adding up to 50% to the order if the non-custodial parent has accumulated arrears .
- If the non-custodial parent is in arrears in the amount of $500 or more, the Unit can intercept his tax refund.
- If the non-custodial parent owes arrears in amount of $600, the Unit can intercept lottery winnings.
- If the non-custodial parent owes at least $300 and the amount past due is two months’ child support or more, the Unit may seize money in bank accounts, or other assets. However, if the payor is having child support deducted from his check, he must have more than $3000 in the bank.
- If the non-custodial parent owes at least $500, and the amount owed is at least 4 months of child support, the matter can be referred to the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance for identification and seizure of assets.
- If the payor owes at least $2500 , the State Department can deny him a new passport or having his current passport renewed.
- If the payor owes at least 4 months worth of child support, the Unit may deny the payor a business or professional license, the renewal of same, or can place limitations on the use of the license.
- The Unit can also garnish unemployment insurance benefits.
Enforcement Of Child Support By The Court
lawyer arguing enforcement case in appellate court
This article is intended to provide general information about how child support orders are enforced in New York. It is not intended to be legal advice. If you need legal advice or are looking to hire a child support enforcement lawyer, you have the obligation to seek a qualified professional. It is often wise to have a consultation with an attorney to discuss your particular circumstances and needs regarding child support enforcement.
The child’s parent or legal custodian can also file a violation petition in court. The great majority of violation cases are heard in the Family Court. In some situations, the violation cases can be filed in the Supreme Court.
In general, most Supreme Court Judges are reluctant to order incarceration for child support violations, unless the payor (and the courts) have first exhausted all other possible remedies, including attachment of assets, such as cars, bank accounts, stock brokerage accounts, homes, and also attempted to get wage assignments if the payor has a job. The Family Court, on the other hand, is not shy about incarcerating parents who refuse to pay child support. It is the obligation of the courts to enforce these orders diligently to uphold the child’s right to financial support.
Many petitioners in Family Court represent themselves. However, it is always better to hire an experienced child support lawyer, because although the law in many respects favors custodial parents, there are some very technical rules about violation of child support proceedings, which require the payor to prove contempt of court. Therefore, a consultation with a knowledgeable attorney can be invaluable in understanding these complex requirements and ensuring your legal needs are effectively met.Violation petitions can also be filed by the New York Office of Child Support Enforcement, and, if the payor is on probation for failure to pay child support, by the Department of Probation. These petitions can include issues related to visitation rights if they are part of the child support agreement, ensuring full representation of the child’s best interests. Effective communication between the involved parties, including the ex-spouse, is crucial during this process to achieve fair resolutions.
A custodial parent or other person who has a child support order which is not being obeyed can file a violation or petition to have a prior support order enforced in the Family Court. Child support violation cases are heard by support magistrates. At the first appearance, the petitioner will be asked if he or she is seeking incarceration, and if the answer is in the affirmative, the payor or respondent, as he is referred to in family court, will be assigned a free attorney for effective legal representation. Clear communication about the legal rights and responsibilities can foster a smoother resolution process.
How The Family Court Handles Enforcement Cases
Violations can also be filed when the respondent fails to pay court-ordered payments for his share of child care expenses or court-ordered payments of health insurance premiums or his share of unreimbursed health care expenses of the child or children. Such petitions may also consider how these financial responsibilities impact visitation agreements, potentially modifying existing arrangements to reflect the current situation. Particularly in cases involving an ex-spouse, open lines of communication can aid in negotiating amicable modifications.
Many violation cases are resolved by the respondent making a good faith lump sum payment against unpaid arrears, or back child support. Where the respondent has genuine difficulties finding a job, but he finds a job while the violation case is still in court, the petitioner may be satisfied once a wage garnishment order begins and payments start to come in. Prompt resolution of financial obligations can sometimes lead to re-evaluation of visitation rights, ensuring both parents maintain a meaningful relationship with their children. Continued communication between the parties, including the ex-spouse, remains essential to ensure the best outcomes for everyone involved.
If the respondent is employed, the court can make an income execution order, where his employer is required to remit a portion of his wages. This often includes representation of the respondent’s financial situation to the court to ensure a fair and just order. It’s vital that communication channels remain open between the respondent and his ex-spouse to avoid misunderstandings and facilitate adherence to court orders.
If the respondent is unemployed and claims that he is having difficulty finding a job, he may qualify for a free program to assist him in finding employment. Although these programs do not have a great success rate, the payor’s cooperation may help him defend a child support enforcement case and potentially favorably adjust any visitation arrangements with the child. Maintaining communication with the ex-spouse during this period can support transparency and trust.
Many cases have to be tried. Under the case of Powers v Powers, once the petitioner shows a failure to pay child support, the burden of proof shifts to the respondent to prove to the court that he was unable to make payments, not that he was unwilling to make payments. In most cases, this is a difficult burden for the respondent to meet, requiring strong legal representation. Meaningful communication with the ex-spouse can sometimes preemptively resolve issues and mitigate conflict.
After a trial (which is called a “hearing” in Family Court), the support magistrate is required to make written findings as to whether or not the failure to pay was willful, and if so, what remedies the magistrate recommends. Possible remedies include the following: Adjustments to visitation terms may also be considered, reflecting the respondent’s commitment to satisfying his obligations. It is important that continuous communication with the ex-spouse is maintained to ensure that the revised terms and obligations are clearly understood and agreed upon.
As part of the services that I offer, I have handled over a hundred NYC child support petitions and have represented both petitioners and respondents. I accept new cases in Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Staten Island, ensuring thorough representation in all proceedings. For cases that require legal intervention, engaging with the child support division can be essential, as it often involves complexities that may ultimately require a court order to address.
- The court can order a money judgment for the amount owed. Money judgments are good for 20 years and earn interest at 9% per annum.
- The court can place the respondent on probation.
- The court can order the respondent to join and cooperate with the STEP work program, a free program which assists people in finding jobs. However, this may only be available to respondents who reside in New York state.
- The court can order incarceration of up to 6 months.
- The court can order incarceration on weekends only. In all cases where incarceration is ordered, the judge is required to set a “purge” amount, which means the respondent can bail himself out by making a lump sum payment in that amount.
- If the respondent’s failure to pay is due to chronic alcohol or drug abuse, the court can mandate a residential treatment program as an alternative to incarceration.
- The court can order a referral to the District Attorney or to the US Attorney’s office for criminal prosecution, as willful failure to pay child support is a federal crime. However, these referrals are extremely rare.
If the magistrate holds a wilfulness hearing and finds willfulness, he is required to refer the case, along with his written findings and recommendations, if any, to a family court judge. Only a judge can order incarceration, often based on a specific court order. Before the pandemic, this was typically done the same day, as there have been situations where the respondent disappears when he suspects jail is imminent. The judge will usually confirm the findings of willfulness unless he is persuaded by arguments, which may include aspects of visitation, made to him.
Confirmation Hearings Before A Judge
In some situations, judges have been persuaded to conduct de novo hearings on the issue of willfulness. If the judge orders incarceration, he is required to set a purge amount. The respondent may sometimes be allowed to call witnesses or submit evidence to convince the judge not to lock him up, or to convince the judge to set a low or reasonable purge amount. It is crucial for the respondent to demonstrate compliance with existing orders and possibly seek assistance from legal counsel, or the child support division, to strengthen their case.
Sometimes, after confirming willfulness, the court will adjourn the case and give the respondent additional time to pay. In this situation, the respondent is usually given a specific amount he is required to pay to avoid jail, as dictated by a court order.
Post navigation ← Previous PostNext Post →
